|
Dies Ist Eine Pfeife / Ceci Est Une Pipe / This is a pipe or, The Day Billy Conklin Learnt To Smoke
by August Meerschart for Morgenspiegel
Billy Conklin’s work has an allusive Duchampian wit, a Magrittian mystery, and a diabolic Swiftian mastery. Since narrative plays as a primary means of organizing people's lives and experiences, Conklin has created a long string of art narratives that some critics have described as superfictions. Other critics have suggested that his work is so far beyond what can properly be considered art, that they use the term “postart” to describe it. Yet within all these definitions Conklin has set up a powerful negative logic, aimed to question the nature of art and art institutions. And, perhaps, even the culture that builds and decides such things. And life itself.
If you crossed Sid Vicious with Oscar Wilde, you might get something approaching Billy Conklin; a dissipated, baby-faced punk dandy. He is gangly and ghostly, and speaks quietly and camply. He is wearing his customary black suit and sunglasses, and he is off his head - he can't stand straight and speaks as if through a fog. He doesn't seem to have the energy or concentration for full sentences.
Now that he has a home in
Question: Why relocate toBilly Conklin: Because the
Q: Your work is often chastised by European critics for being too morbid.Billy Conklin: I think that the way that I deal with death is totally American. And
Q: Conklin: The art world is not a lot to do with art. It’s to do with money and power and position and control. And if they’ve decided you fit their strict profile, you'll be in. If they've made up their minds otherwise, you never will be. I wanted to find another planet altogether, a livable place beyond any art world. And so, one day I landed happily in
Q: SoConklin: Yeah. But I think experience will tell these people that the more they try to slag off Billy Conklin and his work, the more the public reaction will grow stronger in the opposite direction. That’s a universal law. And has nothing to do with the quality of me or my art.
Q: Which draws me to my next question: You’ve been described as an arrogant self-promoter. Do you think of yourself as an important artist?Conklin: Today's artist is of no importance, since he is replaced daily. And no wonder, I'm easily sick and tired of myself. So must the viewers be.
Q: You’ve often been quoted as saying that today’s art is the new readymade. What do you mean by such a disparaging statement?Conklin: There’s nothing disparaging about it. The art of the 21st century is the new readymade. A poorly manufactured object transformed by its mere selection and placement in a gallery or museum context. A shallow, unreflective banality motivated only by the desire to become institutionalized. So that putting these mundane objects in the limelight makes them appear extraordinary instead of ordinary. Such placement makes anything on view precious. At least for the near future.
Q: Yet you don’t see this as something bad. Since you obviously embrace and participate in this duplicity by showing your own work in such institutions.Conklin: Of course I participate. All that today’s museums offer is their institutional authority. So that any visit to one is the ultimate act of deception. And, know it or not, that confronts the current culture full-face. I’m all for that, where everything is hidden by being exposed in plain sight. We live in a world of deliberate artifice compounded by such direct misrepresentations of truth and beauty, and by such cunning indirections of those who decide and are in positions of power.
Q: Did you steal your power to be an artist? You’ve also been accused of being a fake. Or even a forger.Conklin: The forger's art is simultaneously self-aggrandizing and self-effacing, selfish and generous, bold and timid. By taking other artists’ work as my own, dissolves these boundaries of constraints and permits us to push one’s imagination to the limit. To explore every possibility. Someone makes a pretty painting and puts it on the wall, because it can’t stand on its own feet. I give art feet so that it can stand on its own.
Q: And by this action, which some critics have termed superfictions, what do you hope to accomplish?Conklin: To simply ask those questions this century has already forgotten. What is art? What is the role of the artist? What is the role of the public? A gallery? A museum?
Q: And once there are answers?Conklin: No answers. Never. Just data to gather. Then to analyze all that. To analyze the conditions of art production at the start of this new century. And to discover that point where the modern equation between art and truth has lost meaning. And, in so doing, life itself.
|
||||